NFL Touchdown Prop Types: From First Scorer to Two-Plus-TD Markets
Available in US
The full menu of NFL touchdown markets at UK books
Walk into any UK sportsbook’s NFL section on a Sunday morning and the touchdown menu is longer than most punters expect. Anytime scorer, first scorer, last scorer, two-or-more, method of touchdown — each one frames the same underlying event differently, and each one carries a different margin, a different analytical framework, and a different risk profile. I have spent years working through this menu item by item, and what I have found is that most UK punters stick to one or two types without realising that the best value often sits in the markets they never open.
The sheer popularity of touchdown markets at UK sportsbooks is no accident. BetMGM data shows that anytime touchdown scorer leads all player prop markets by handle, with first touchdown scorer sitting third. Together, the various touchdown prop types form the most heavily traded family of player markets in NFL betting. The bookmakers know this, and they price each type accordingly — the most popular markets carry the tightest margins, while the niche types carry wider ones. Understanding the full taxonomy is the first step toward understanding where the book is taking the largest cut.
First touchdown scorer
There is something irresistible about first touchdown scorer bets. The prices are long — typically 7.00 to 15.00 for plausible candidates — and hitting one feels like genuine prophecy. I have hit exactly four first-scorer bets in nine seasons. The rush never fades. The maths, however, are merciless.
A first touchdown scorer bet requires your selected player to score the very first touchdown of the game. Not the second, not the third — the first. In a game where seven touchdowns are scored, your player needs to find the end zone before the other 105 players on the pitch. The implied probability at a price of 9.00 is roughly 11%, but in most games the true probability for any single player is closer to 6-8%, meaning the book is baking in a substantial margin.
What makes the first-scorer market particularly treacherous is the variance. Even if you correctly identify the player most likely to score first — typically a running back on the team that receives the opening kickoff — the probability is low enough that you need a very long sample to see any edge materialise. I track first-scorer bets separately in my records, and the return profile looks like a lottery: long stretches of losses punctuated by occasional big wins. Over five seasons, my first-scorer bets are net negative despite what I consider to be solid selection methodology.
The one situation where I do bet first scorer is when the opening drive tendencies of both teams create a clear asymmetry. Some offences run the ball on their opening possession at rates above 65%, and if that team receives the opening kick, their lead running back has a meaningfully higher first-scorer probability than the price suggests. This is a narrow edge, but it exists.
Last touchdown scorer
If first scorer is a lottery, last scorer is a lottery where someone changes the numbers after you have bought your ticket. The last touchdown of an NFL game is determined by clock management, garbage time, and situational decisions that have almost nothing to do with regular offensive tendencies.
In a close game, the last touchdown might come from a two-minute drill where the quarterback targets his most reliable receiver. In a blowout, it might come from a backup running back grinding out a meaningless score in the final minutes. In an overtime thriller, it could be anyone. The last-scorer outcome is so context-dependent that the pregame data you use to handicap it is nearly worthless by the time the fourth quarter arrives.
I stopped betting last touchdown scorer entirely after the 2022 season. My records showed that my selections had no statistically significant relationship with the actual outcome — I was essentially picking names at random and paying a 15-20% margin for the privilege. The books are happy to offer this market because they know the public finds it exciting and the margin is wide enough to absorb variance on their side.
Two-or-more touchdowns
Now we are in interesting territory. The two-or-more-touchdowns market — sometimes labelled “2+ TDs” — asks whether a player will score at least twice in the same game. The prices are typically between 3.50 and 8.00 for realistic candidates, reflecting the lower probability compared to anytime markets.
What appeals to me about this market is that it rewards a genuine analytical view. Multi-touchdown games are not random — they cluster around specific player profiles and game environments. Running backs with dominant goal-line roles in high-total games are the most frequent multi-TD scorers. The data is consistent: a bellcow back facing a bottom-10 red-zone defence in a game totalled above 49 scores two or more touchdowns roughly 18-22% of the time. At a price of 4.50, the implied probability is 22.2%, which means these situations occasionally offer near-breakeven or positive expected value.
The trap is overextending the logic to players who do not fit the profile. A slot receiver might score two touchdowns once every 30 games. His 2+ TD price of 7.00 implies a 14.3% probability, which is wildly inflated relative to his actual rate. The books know that multi-touchdown bets are entertainment products for most of their customers, and they price secondary players accordingly.
Method of touchdown markets
Method of touchdown is the most underexplored corner of the TD prop family at UK sportsbooks, and frankly it deserves more attention than it gets.
These markets ask not just whether a player will score but how — by rush, by reception, by passing, or by return. A running back’s anytime TD price might sit at 1.70, but his “touchdown by rushing” price sits at 1.85 and his “touchdown by reception” price at 6.00. The split reveals how the book views the player’s scoring profile, and it occasionally reveals mispricing.
The situations I look for are dual-threat players whose scoring methods are more balanced than the book assumes. A running back who catches 4 to 5 passes per game and runs red-zone routes might have a higher receiving touchdown probability than the 6.00 price implies. The book sets the method split based on historical averages, but individual players deviate from those averages based on their offensive scheme and usage patterns.
Method markets also create opportunities in combination with bet builders. You can pair “touchdown by reception” for a running back with a receiving yards over on the same player, creating a correlated parlay where both legs benefit from the same underlying event — a game where the back is heavily involved in the passing game. The pricing on these combinations is sometimes generous because the book’s correlation adjustment does not fully account for the relationship between receiving usage and receiving touchdowns.
Where each type tilts toward or against the punter
After nine seasons of tracking every type of touchdown prop, the picture is clear enough to share. Anytime scorer is the most researchable and the closest to a fair market. The margins are still against you, but the data you need to form an edge — red-zone usage, target share, game total — is publicly available and demonstrably predictive. This is where most of my TD prop action sits.
First scorer is entertainment. The edge, if it exists, is thin enough that you need hundreds of bets to verify it, and the margin eats most of the potential return. Last scorer is pure noise. Two-or-more is the most interesting of the niche markets because it rewards concentrated analysis on a narrow set of candidates, but the variance is high enough that it demands strict bankroll discipline — small stakes, long horizons.
Method of touchdown is the market with the widest pricing inefficiencies, but the problem is liquidity. Not every UK book offers it, and when they do, the bet limits are lower because the market is thinner. If you can find consistent access to method markets at reasonable stakes, it is worth incorporating into your workflow. If the limits are too low to matter, focus your energy on anytime and two-or-more.
For a deeper dive into the most popular member of this family, the anytime touchdown scorer guide covers the pricing mechanics, value identification, and weekly research process in detail.
Are two-touchdown props paid as a single market or as a parlay?
Two-or-more touchdown props are a single market, not a parlay. You are betting on the outcome that a specific player scores two or more touchdowns in the game at a single price. This is different from parlaying two separate anytime TD bets, which would require both legs to win. The single-market structure means the price reflects the true probability of multi-TD performance, not a multiplied payout.
Does a defensive touchdown void a first TD scorer bet?
No. A defensive touchdown — such as a pick-six or a fumble return — counts as the first touchdown of the game if it occurs before any offensive score. If you have backed an offensive player as first touchdown scorer and the defence scores first, your bet loses. It is not voided. This is an often overlooked risk that makes first-scorer bets on offensive players slightly worse than their face-value odds suggest.
Which touchdown prop has the highest bookmaker margin?
First touchdown scorer typically carries the highest margin among touchdown prop types. The market covers a large field of players, each at long odds, and the cumulative overround across the full field can exceed 130% at some UK sportsbooks. Last touchdown scorer margins are similarly high. Anytime scorer carries the lowest margin of the touchdown family because it attracts the most volume, and two-or-more sits in between.
Prepared by the Prop Bets for nfl editorial staff.
